Instagramming Issues: Agenda Setting During the 2016 Presidential Campaign
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
A Readability Analysis of Campaign Speeches from the 2016 US Presidential Campaign
Introduction The goal of this report is to assess the readability of the campaign speeches of five presidential candidates in the 2016 US presidential race and to examine their evolution over time and according to the type of speech. Readability can be defined here as the reading level, from grade 1 to grade 12, of a document. It is determined by looking at the lexical contents and the grammati...
متن کاملAgenda-setting with Local and National Issues
AUTHORS’ NOTE: The research reported on here was supported by a Grant from the University of Michigan’s Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies. Three factors lead to the hypothesis that agenda-setting should be weaker at the local political level compared to the national level: (1) the more directly observable nature of local political problems, (2) the nature and strength of local interp...
متن کاملTactics and Tallies: A Study of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Campaign Using Twitter 'Likes'
We propose a framework to measure, evaluate, and rank campaign effectiveness in the ongoing 2016 U.S. presidential election. Using Twitter data collected from Sept. 2015 to Jan. 2016, we first uncover the tweeting tactics of the candidates and second, using negative binomial regression and exploiting the variations in ‘likes,’ we evaluate the effectiveness of these tactics. Thirdly, we rank the...
متن کاملEcho Chambers and Partisan Polarization: Evidence from the 2016 Presidential Campaign
Where do partisans get their election news, and does news consumption influence their candidate assessments? To shed light on these questions, we track the web browsing behavior of a national sample during the 2016 presidential campaign and then merge these data with a panel survey administered in August and November. We find that exposure to election news is polarized; partisans gravitate to “...
متن کاملThe IWSLT 2016 Evaluation Campaign
The IWSLT 2016 Evaluation Campaign featured two tasks: the translation of talks and the translation of video conference conversations. While the first task extends previously offered tasks with talks from a different source, the second task is completely new. For both tasks, three tracks were organised: automatic speech recognition (ASR), spoken language translation (SLT), and machine translati...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Social Media + Society
سال: 2020
ISSN: 2056-3051,2056-3051
DOI: 10.1177/2056305120940803